public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Moyer <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Cc: io-uring <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring/register: guard compat syscall with CONFIG_COMPAT
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 10:59:13 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> (Jens Axboe's message of "Wed, 17 Jan 2024 07:51:07 -0700")

Hi, Jens,

Jens Axboe <[email protected]> writes:

> Add compat.h include to avoid a potential build issue:
>
> io_uring/register.c:281:6: error: call to undeclared function 'in_compat_syscall'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>
> if (in_compat_syscall()) {
>     ^
> 1 warning generated.
> io_uring/register.c:282:9: error: call to undeclared function 'compat_get_bitmap'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> ret = compat_get_bitmap(cpumask_bits(new_mask),
>       ^
>
> Fixes: c43203154d8a ("io_uring/register: move io_uring_register(2) related code to register.c")
> Reported-by: Manu Bretelle <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/io_uring/register.c b/io_uring/register.c
> index 708dd1d89add..5e62c1208996 100644
> --- a/io_uring/register.c
> +++ b/io_uring/register.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>  #include <linux/uaccess.h>
>  #include <linux/nospec.h>
> +#include <linux/compat.h>
>  #include <linux/io_uring.h>
>  #include <linux/io_uring_types.h>

This makes sense to me, but I wasn't able to reproduce that build error
after disabling CONFIG_COMPAT.

> @@ -278,13 +279,14 @@ static __cold int io_register_iowq_aff(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
>  	if (len > cpumask_size())
>  		len = cpumask_size();
>  
> -	if (in_compat_syscall()) {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> +	if (in_compat_syscall())

I don't think this is needed.

linux/compat.h:
...
#else /* !CONFIG_COMPAT */

#define is_compat_task() (0)
/* Ensure no one redefines in_compat_syscall() under !CONFIG_COMPAT */
#define in_compat_syscall in_compat_syscall
static inline bool in_compat_syscall(void) { return false; }

Isn't the code fine as-is?

-Jeff

>  		ret = compat_get_bitmap(cpumask_bits(new_mask),
>  					(const compat_ulong_t __user *)arg,
>  					len * 8 /* CHAR_BIT */);
> -	} else {
> +	else
> +#endif
>  		ret = copy_from_user(new_mask, arg, len);
> -	}
>  
>  	if (ret) {
>  		free_cpumask_var(new_mask);


  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-17 15:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-17 14:51 [PATCH] io_uring/register: guard compat syscall with CONFIG_COMPAT Jens Axboe
2024-01-17 15:59 ` Jeff Moyer [this message]
2024-01-17 16:04   ` Jens Axboe
2024-01-17 16:24     ` Jeff Moyer
2024-01-17 16:45       ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox