From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, io-uring@vger.kernel.org,
"Christian Brauner (Amutable)" <brauner@kernel.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/7] fork: refuse new threads while a coredump or an exec is in progress
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2026 11:17:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260917-work-coredump-fixes-v2-1-f3787fcda051@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260917-work-coredump-fixes-v2-0-f3787fcda051@kernel.org>
Say a SQPOLL thread is a member of a thread-group that coredumps.
The coredump code uses zap_process() and sends SIGKILL. The SQPOLL
thread uses io_sqd_handle_event() and calls get_signal(). It removes
SIGKILL from the pending set and returns. The SQPOLL thread breaks out
of the loop and drains its own task work.
Any pending io_req_task_submit() with REQ_F_FORCE_ASYNC creates a new
worker when no other worker is free. So it ends up calling
create_io_thread() from a thread whose fatal signal is gone. That means
copy_process() allows the creation. It's also possible for an exiting
io-wq worker to push new work onto the SQPOLL thread.
zap_threads() counts the number of coredumping threads. The coredump
client waits in coredump_wait_inactive() until all threads in the
thread-group are parked. The new thread exits right away because the
workqueue is going down. It inherited PF_SIGNALED from its creator so
it links itself onto core_state->tasks in coredump_task_exit(). The
problem is that it then decrements "threads_remaining" even though
zap_process() never actually counted the new thread. So the count goes
to zero too early. So either the coredump misses the thread or it dumps
a thread that is still alive.
The same race exists during exec. de_thread() zaps the other threads
the same way and counts them in signal->notify_count, and a zapped user
worker that has already dequeued its SIGKILL can still clone while
de_thread() waits for that count. And once de_thread() has cleared
signal->group_exec_task the exec'ing thread itself runs task work in
io_uring_task_cancel() and a pending create_worker_cb() creates a
thread after the group was made single-threaded.
Close all of that in copy_process(). Refuse to create a thread while:
(1) SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT is set (set together with core_state by zap_process()
(2) signal->group_exec_task is set
(3) while current is in execve
Conditions (1) and (2) are handled with siglock help which means
copy_process() and zap_process() synchronize on it. create_io_thread()
treats the failure as a failed task creation and doesn't retry.
Fixes: 3bfe6106693b ("io-wq: fork worker threads from original task")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner (Amutable) <brauner@kernel.org>
---
kernel/fork.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index 10be4a0ecb3f..6cd167a2b27b 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -2491,8 +2491,10 @@ __latent_entropy struct task_struct *copy_process(
goto bad_fork_core_free;
}
- /* Let kill terminate clone/fork in the middle */
- if (fatal_signal_pending(current)) {
+ /* Let kill or a group exit, exec or coredump abort clone/fork */
+ if (fatal_signal_pending(current) ||
+ (current->signal->flags & SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT) ||
+ current->signal->group_exec_task || current->in_execve) {
retval = -EINTR;
goto bad_fork_core_free;
}
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-17 9:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-17 9:17 [PATCH v2 0/7] coredump & signals: an impossible affair Christian Brauner
2026-09-17 9:17 ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2026-09-17 16:33 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] fork: refuse new threads while a coredump or an exec is in progress Bradley Morgan
2026-09-18 10:40 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-09-18 12:24 ` Christian Brauner
2026-09-18 12:52 ` Christian Brauner
2026-09-18 13:41 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-09-18 14:29 ` Christian Brauner
2026-09-18 15:00 ` Christian Brauner
2026-09-18 15:15 ` Christian Brauner
2026-09-21 10:32 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-09-21 11:46 ` Christian Brauner
2026-09-21 12:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-09-17 9:17 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] coredump: hold RCU while releasing parked threads Christian Brauner
2026-09-17 9:17 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] signal: only SIGKILL and the freezers interrupt a coredumping task Christian Brauner
2026-09-17 9:17 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] coredump: parse a snapshot of core_pattern Christian Brauner
2026-09-18 15:28 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-09-17 9:17 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] io-wq: order the exit bit against worker creation task work Christian Brauner
2026-09-18 14:55 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-09-17 9:17 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] signal: don't retarget shared signals in a dying thread group Christian Brauner
2026-09-18 14:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-09-17 9:17 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] selftests/coredump: test shared signal retargeting during a dump Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260917-work-coredump-fixes-v2-1-f3787fcda051@kernel.org \
--to=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=neil@brown.name \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox